Loading...
How efficiently is the company using your money? These two ratios answer that.
Suppose you give โน1 lakh to two friends to start businesses. Friend A returns โน20,000 profit in a year. Friend B returns โน8,000. Who ran the better business? Obviously Friend A โ they generated a 20% return on your money vs 8%.
This is exactly what ROE (Return on Equity) and ROCE (Return on Capital Employed) measure for companies โ how much profit they generate for every rupee of capital invested. A company can show high profits in absolute terms; what matters is how much capital it needed to generate those profits.
Warren Buffett famously calls ROE one of his top criteria. His ideal company earns high returns on equity without taking on excessive debt. That combination โ high ROE + low debt โ is the fingerprint of a compounding machine.
Formula: ROE = PAT รท Shareholders' Equity ร 100, where PAT is Profit After Tax and Shareholders' Equity is Total Assets โ Total Liabilities.
ROE tells you: for every โน100 of shareholders' money sitting in the business, how many rupees of profit did the company generate? A 20% ROE means โน20 of profit per โน100 of equity. Consistent 20%+ ROE over 5-10 years is the hallmark of a quality business.
Formula: ROCE = EBIT รท Capital Employed ร 100, where EBIT is Earnings Before Interest & Tax and Capital Employed is Total Assets โ Current Liabilities.
ROCE goes one step beyond ROE โ it measures profitability on all capital used, including debt. This makes it better for comparing companies with different debt levels. It answers: regardless of how this business is funded (equity or debt), how efficiently is it deploying capital?
A ROCE higher than the cost of debt (i.e., the interest rate on borrowings) means the company is creating value. If ROCE is lower than its cost of borrowing, the company is destroying wealth โ every rupee of debt is costing more than it earns.
When to prefer ROE: For debt-free or low-debt companies (TCS, Infosys, Nestle). ROE directly tells you what shareholders are earning. Also better for comparing companies within a sector that have similar capital structures.
When to prefer ROCE: For capital-intensive businesses (steel, cement, infrastructure) or when comparing companies with very different debt levels. ROCE normalises for debt, giving a cleaner picture of operational efficiency.
Asset-light businesses consistently outperform capital-heavy ones on ROE/ROCE (illustrative figures):
| Company | Sector | ROE | ROCE | D/E |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nestle India | FMCG | 80%+ | 85%+ | ~0 |
| TCS | IT Services | 45% | 55% | ~0 |
| Asian Paints | Paints/FMCG | 28% | 35% | 0.1x |
| Tata Steel | Steel | 12% | 10% | 0.8x |
| Adani Ports | Infrastructure | 15% | 11% | 1.2x |
Illustrative figures. Asset-light businesses naturally generate higher returns on capital โ that's their moat.
ROE can be high for different reasons. DuPont analysis breaks it down into three drivers so you understand why it's high: ROE = Net Profit Margin ร Asset Turnover ร Financial Leverage.
The best companies have high ROE driven by high margins and efficient asset use โ not by borrowing heavily. If ROE is high but leverage is very high too, dig deeper before investing.
Banks have naturally high leverage (your deposits are their liabilities), so their ROE appears high but is not comparable to FMCG. For banks, use ROA (Return on Assets) and NIM (Net Interest Margin) instead. Always compare like-for-like โ sector vs sector.
Two companies can arrive at the same 20% ROE through completely different paths, and DuPont analysis is what tells them apart. An FMCG company might get there mostly through a high net profit margin on modest asset turnover, reflecting brand pricing power. An asset-light IT services company might combine a healthy margin with high asset turnover and almost no leverage. A third company might show the same 20% ROE almost entirely from financial leverage, with thin margins and low asset turnover โ this is the version worth being cautious about, since it means the return is coming from borrowed money amplifying a fairly ordinary underlying business, not from genuine operational strength.
Key Takeaway: Look for companies with 20%+ ROE and ROCE consistently over 5+ years, with low or no debt. That combination means the business is genuinely excellent โ not artificially inflated by leverage. Use DuPont analysis to understand the source of the returns, and always compare ROE within the same sector rather than across unrelated industries. The best Indian compounders (TCS, Asian Paints, Nestle, Page Industries) all share this trait.
Generally, 15-20% ROE is considered good for most sectors. Above 25% consistently is excellent. For FMCG companies (Nestle, HUL), ROE above 40-50% is common because they're asset-light with strong brands. For capital-intensive industries (steel, cement), even 12-15% ROE can be considered reasonable. Always benchmark against sector peers, not a universal number.
Both together are more powerful than either alone. For debt-free companies, ROE and ROCE are nearly the same โ both work well. For companies with significant debt, ROCE is more reliable because it's not distorted by leverage. Rule of thumb: if D/E > 0.5, use ROCE as your primary metric. For near debt-free companies, ROE is fine.
Paradoxically, yes. Extremely high ROE (90%+) can sometimes signal that the company has very little equity on its books โ either because it's been buying back shares aggressively or because it's heavily debt-funded. Always check the balance sheet. For companies like Nestle India (ROE 80%+), it's genuine โ they earn so much with so little capital. That's the ideal.
Screener.in shows both ROE and ROCE on every company's summary page, along with a 5-10 year trend. This trend view is critical โ a single year's ROE can be misleading. Look for stability and consistency. Tickertape also shows these metrics with peer comparisons, which is very useful for quick sector benchmarking.
By splitting ROE into margin, asset turnover, and leverage, it reveals whether a high number comes from a genuinely efficient, profitable business or mostly from financial leverage amplifying a fairly ordinary underlying operation โ the latter is a much riskier way to arrive at the same headline number.
Disclaimer: This article is for general educational purposes only and does not constitute personalized financial, investment, tax, or legal advice. Figures, rates, and rules mentioned may change over time โ verify current details with an official source or a qualified professional before making financial decisions.
Go Deeper
Read: Stock Market Basics